Re-scaling the monetary value of the food component of absolute poverty basket: revision of saving coefficients and alternative approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v78i4.410Abstract
Aim of the paper is to describe the revision of the coefficients for re-scaling the monetary value of the food basket for absolute poverty estimates. This revision is part of the work of the Inter Institution Scientific Commission on Absolute Poverty (IISCAP) set up by Istat to revise and update the current methodology. The methodology proposed by Istat (2009) for re-scaling the monetary value of the food component of absolute poverty basket is based on Households’ Budget Survey data and produces scaling coefficients representing savings that a family can achieve. The hypothesis that a household realizes actual savings from various dimensions of choice and that these vary with consumer demographics is well-described in economic literature (Griffith et al., 2009) and is confirmed by the evidence. Current Istat methodology primarily reproduces the impact on food expenditure of promotions and surcharges on price levels associated with households’ demographics, but it cannot isolate the other influences. The coefficients analysed and described in this paper are mainly based on the vast literature available for the equivalence scales. Therefore, the approach used for the revision of saving coefficients is potentially valid and suitable for new estimates of equivalence scales (Carbonaro, 1985; Betti, 1999). The Commission also defined a roadmap to infer the impact of discounts and surcharges on prices with the introduction of models based on prices/quotations from digital transaction recorded at the cash registers (Scanner Data).
References
ARMSTRONG M. 2016. Nonlinear Pricing, Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 583-614.
BETTI G. 1999. Quadratic Engel Curves and Household Equivalence Scales: the Case of Italy 1985-1994. Statistics Research Report LSERR50, London School of Economics.
CARBONARO G. 1985. Nota sulle scale di equivalenza. In COMMISSIONE DI INDAGINE SULLA POVERTÀ E SULL’EMARGINAZIONE (Ed.) Primo rapporto sulla povertà in Italia, Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, pp. 153-159.
DE SANTIS G. 1996. Le misure della povertà in Italia: scale di equivalenza e aspetti demografici. Società e istituzioni, Roma: Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri.
DUBOIS P., GRIFFITH R., O'CONNELL M. 2022. The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research, Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 723-745.
ENGEL, E. 1895. Die Lebenskosten Belgischer Arbeiter-Familien Fruher and jetzt, International Statistical Institute Bulletin, Vol. 9, pp. 1-74.
GRIFFITH R., LEIBTAG E., LEICESTER A., NEVO A. 2009. Consumer Shopping Behavior: How Much Do Consumers Save?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 99-120.
ISTAT 2009. La misura della povertà assoluta. Metodi e Norme n. 39. https://
www.istat.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/misura_della_poverta_assoluta.pdf
JARAVEL X. 2019. The Unequal Gains from Product Innovations: Evidence from the U.S. Retail Sector, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 134, No. 2, pp. 715-783.
MUELLBAUER J. 1977. Testing the Barten Model of Household Composition Effects and the Cost of Children, Economic Journal, Vol. 87, pp. 460-487.
OLÁH J., KASZA G., SZABÓ-BÓDI B., SZAKOS D., POPP J., LAKNER Z. 2022. Household Food Waste Research: The Current State of the Art and a Guided Tour for Further Development, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 10-2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Federico Di Leo, Isabella Corazziari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.