The geography of green innovation

Authors

  • Margherita Gerolimetto Dipartimento di Economia, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia
  • Stefano Magrini Dipartimento di Economia - Università Ca' Foscari Venezia
  • Alessandro Spiganti Dipartimento di Economia - Università Ca' Foscari Venezia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v79i4.385

Abstract

In the last decades, the geography of innovation activity became much more concentrated. By focusing on the metropolitan statistical area of residence of the inventors of patents granted by the United States Patents and Trademark Office between 1976 and 2020, we investigate whether this is true also for "green" innovation, i.e. patents covering mitigation or adaptation to climate change. We find a sharp increase in concentration across areas after the beginning of the 2000s, with areas that are generally more innovative also producing more green patents. Moreover, for an in-depth analysis of spatial dependence patterns, we firstly survey the literature to find tests suitable for comparing spatial patterns and then apply these tests to the data on green patenting in comparison with non-green patenting. We find significant differences between the two phenomena.

References

AGHION P., AKCIGIT U., BERGEAUD A., BLUNDELL R., HEMOUS D. 2019. Innovation and top income inequality. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 1–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy027

ALBA-FERNANDEZ M.V., ARIZA-LOPEZ F.J., JIMENEZ-GAMERO M.D., RODRIGUEZ-AVI J. 2016. On the similarity analysis of spatial patterns. Spatial Statistics, Vol. 18, pp. 352-362, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2016.07.004

ANDRESEN M.A. 2009. Testing for similarity in area-based spatial patterns: a non parametric Monte Carlo approach. Applied Geography, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 333–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.004

ANDREWS M.J., WHALLEY A. 2021. 150 years of the geography of innovation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 94, pp. 103-127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103627

ANSELIN L. 1995. Local Indicators of Spatial Association LISA. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 27, pp. 93-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x

AUDRETSCH D.B., FELDMAN M.P. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 630–640.

BERKES E., GAETANI R. 2021. The Geography of Unconventional Innovation. The Economic Journal, Vol. 131, pp. 1466–1514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa111

BUZARD K., CARLINO G.A., HUNT R.M., CARR J.K., SMITH T.E, 2017. The agglomeration of American R&D labs. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 101, pp. 14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.05.007

CASTALDI C, LOS B, 2017. Geographical patterns in US inventive activity 1977–1998: The “regional inversion” was underestimated. Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1187–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.005

CLIFFORD P., RICHARDSON S., HEMON D. 1989. Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics, Vol. 45, pp. 123-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2532039

CORROCHER N., MALERBA F., MORRISON A. 2021. Technological regimes, patent growth, and catching-up in green technologies. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 1084–1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab025

DELGADO M., PORTER ME., STERN S. 2014. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, Vol. 43, pp. 1785-1799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007

DRENNAN MP. 2005. Possible sources of wage divergence among metropolitan areas of the United States. Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1609–1620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500185538

DUTILLEUL P., CLIFFORD P., RICHARDSON S., HEMON D. 1993. Test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 305-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2532625

ELLISON G., GLAESER E. 1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 5, pp. 889–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/262098

FLORIDA R. 2009. Who’s your city? New York: Basic Books.

FORMAN C., GOLDFARB A. 2021. Concentration and agglomeration of IT innovation and entrepreneurship: Evidence from patenting. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w27338

GLAESER EL., GOTTLIEB J.D. 2009. The Wealth of Cities: Agglomeration Economies and Spatial Equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 983–1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983

GREENSTONE M., HORNBECK R., MORETTI E. 2010. Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 118, No. 3 pp. 536-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/653714

JAFFE A., TRAJTENBERG M., HENDERSON R, 1993. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 577-598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401

KERR W., KOMINERS S. 2015. Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2015, vol. 97, No. 4, 877-899.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00471

LERNER J., SERU A. 2022. The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Finance and Beyond. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 2667–2704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab084

MAGRINI S., SPIGANTI A. 2024. A tale of two cities: Communication, innovation, and divergence. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 390–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13175

MARSHALL A. 1890. Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.

MORETTI E. 2021. The Effect of High-Tech Clusters on the Productivity of Top Inventors. American Economic Review, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 3328–3375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191277

VALLEJOS R., OSORIO F., BEVILACQUA M. 2020. Spatial Relationships Between Two Georeferenced Variables: With Applications in R. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56681-4

VEEFKIND V., HURTADO-ALBIR J., ANGELUCCI S., KARACHALIOS K., THUMM N. 2012. A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies. World Patent Information, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 106–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2011.12.004

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11