Spatial Correlation Between Climate Change and Economic Growth in EU

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v79i3.306

Keywords:

Climate Change, Spatial Correation, Enviromental, Eurostat

Abstract

Over the past decade, Europe has faced significant challenges due to the increase in net greenhouse gas emissions and the resulting economic losses associated with climate change. This article focuses on a detailed analysis of the trends in such emissions, the economic losses incurred, and the impact of adopted environmental taxation policies. Utilizing data from Eurostat spanning from 2013 to 2021, our study aims to explore the interconnections among these factors, evaluate the effectiveness of implemented fiscal policies in mitigating these impacts, and examine their spatial distribution. Through the application of the Moran's Index, we examined the presence of spatial autocorrelation in the data to identify any significant geographic patterns. Results reveal that there has been a slight decrease in net greenhouse gas emissions across Europe from 2013 to 2021, thanks the efforts to curb them also through environmental taxation policies. The analysis indicates that while environmental taxation policies have been implemented, their effectiveness in reducing emissions and mitigating economic losses varies across regions. Some areas have seen more success in curbing emissions and minimizing economic impacts compared to others.

References

ADGER W. N., BROWN K., NELSON D. R., BERKES F., EAKIN H., FOLKE C., GALVIN K., GUNDERSON L., GOULDEN M., O’BRIEN K., RUITENBEEK J., TOMPKINS E. L. 2011. Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 757–766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.133

ALBERGEL C., CALVET J.-C., GIBELIN A.-L., LAFONT S., ROUJEAN J.-L., BERNE C., TRAULLÉ O., FRITZ, N. 2010. Observed and modelled ecosystem respiration and gross primary production of a grassland in southwestern France, Biogeosciences, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 1657–1668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1657-2010

ALBRECHT J. 2002. 11. Technical potential for CO2 emissions reductions and the scope for subsidies1, Greening the Budget: Budgetary Policies for Environmental Improvement, Vol. 743: 195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009918.00024

ALIREZAEI M., ONAT N. C., TATARI O., ABDEL-ATY M. 2017. The climate change-road safety-economy nexus: a system dynamics approach to understanding complex interdependencies, Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, p.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010006

BARDE J.-P. 1999. Environmental taxes in oecd countries: an overview. China in the Global Economy Environmental Taxes Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries, Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries, Vol. 19.

BEKTI R. D., NURHADIYANTI G., IRWANSYAH E. 2014. Spatial pattern of diarrhea based on regional economic and environment by spatial autoregressive model. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1621, pp. 454–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4898506

CHEN Z., YU G., ZHU X., WANG Q., NIU S., HU Z. 2015. Covariation between gross primary production and ecosystem respiration across space and the underlying mechanisms: A global synthesis, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 203, pp. 180–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.01.012

CLINCH J. P., DUNNE L., DRESNER S. 2006. Environmental and wider implications of political impediments to environmental tax reform, Energy Policy, Vol. 34, No.8, pp. 960–970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.048

CLOY J. M., SMITH K. A., DELLASALA D. A., GOLDSTEIN M. I. 2017. Greenhouse gas sources and sinks. In Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene , Elsevier, pp. 391–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09961-4

DELL M., JONES B. F., OLKEN B. A. 2008. Climate change and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w14132

DIAB M. Y., KHALIFA M. A., RADY T. A., ABO LABAN A. M. 2022. Proposed framework For The Environmental Tax System To Reduce Environmental Pollution and Contribute To Sustainable Development (Applied study On The Industrial Sector, Journal of Environmental Science, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 41–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jes.2022.110369.1135

DO VALLE P. O., PINTASSILGO P., MATIAS A., ANDRÉ F. 2012. Tourist attitudes towards an accommodation tax earmarked for environmental protection: A survey in the Algarve, Tourism Management, Vol. 33, No.6, pp. 1408–1416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.01.003

DONG G., HARRIS R. 2015. Spatial Autoregressive Models for Geographically Hierarchical Data Structures. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 173–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12049

DOUENNE T., FABRE A. 2020. French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies, Ecological Economics, Vol. 169: 106496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106496

FALLAH GHALHARI G., DADASHI ROUDBARI A. 2018. An investigation on thermal patterns in Iran based on spatial autocorrelation, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Vol. 131, Nos. 3–4, pp. 865–876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-2015-3

FIEDLER A., RIHS T. 2020. Carbon taxation: Comparing France and Switzerland. Der Öffentliche Sektor, Vol. 46, No. 2.

GALEOTTI M., ROSON R. 2011. Economic impacts of climate change in Italy and the Mediterranean: updating the evidence. Available at SSRN 1935280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1935280

GRIFFITH D. A. 2021. Interpreting Moran Eigenvector Maps with the Getis-Ord Gi* Statistic, Professional Geographer, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 447–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2021.1878908

KLEIN R. J. T., SCHIPPER E. L. F., DESSAI S. 2005. Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: Three research questions. Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 579–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010

KUMAR A., SINGH P., RAIZADA P., HUSSAIN C. M. 2022. IMPACT of COVID-19 on greenhouse gases emissions: A critical review, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 806: 150349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150349

LEGGETT J. A. 2007. Climate change: Science and policy implications.

MASTERS W. A., MCMILLAN M. S. 2001. Climate and scale in economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 6, pp. 167–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011398431524

MORAN P. A. P. 1948. The Interpretation of Statistical Maps, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), Vol. 10, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x

PAULIUK S., HEEREN N. 2021. Material efficiency and its contribution to climate change mitigation in Germany: A deep decarbonization scenario analysis until 2060. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 479–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13091

PINEDA-RÍOS, W., GIRALDO, R., & PORCU, E. 2019. Functional SAR models: With application to spatial econometrics. Spatial Statistics, 29, 145–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2018.12.002

QADIR S. A., AL-MOTAIRI H., TAHIR F., AL-FAGIH L. 2021. Incentives and strategies for financing the renewable energy transition: A review, Energy Reports, Vol. 7, pp. 3590–3606. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.041

SHAMMUGAM S., SCHLEICH J., SCHLOMANN B., MONTRONE L. 2022. Did Germany reach its 2020 climate targets thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic?, Climate Policy, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 1069–1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2063247

STOJANOVIĆ B., RADUKIĆ S. 2006. EU environmental policy and competitiveness, Panoeconomicus, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 471–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN0604471S

STOTT P. 2016. How climate change affects extreme weather events, Science, Vol. 352, No. 6293, pp. 1517–1518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7271

SU N., WEN H. 2023. The Impact of Extreme Weather Events on the Economic Performance. BCP Business & Management, Vol. 38, pp. 2703–2709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4176

TASHILOVA A. A., ASHABOKOV B. A., KESHEVA L. A., TEUNOVA N. V. 2019. Analysis of climate change in the caucasus region: end of the 20th–beginning of the 21st century, Climate, Vol. 7, No. 1, p.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7010011

THORSON J. T. 2019. Guidance for decisions using the Vector Autoregressive Spatio-Temporal (VAST) package in stock, ecosystem, habitat and climate assessments, Fisheries Research, Vol. 210, pp. 143–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.013

TOL R. S. J. 2009. The economic effects of climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 29–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.2.29

VAN KOOTEN G. C. 2004. Climate change economics: Why international accords fail. Edward Elgar Publishing.

WAGNER H. H., FORTIN M. J. 2005. Spatial analysis of landscapes: Concepts and statistics, Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 8, pp. 1975–1987. Ecological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0914

WANG X., KHURSHID A., QAYYUM S., CALIN A. C. 2022. The role of green innovations, environmental policies and carbon taxes in achieving the sustainable development goals of carbon neutrality, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 1–15.

ZHENG X., STREIMIKIENE D., BALEZENTIS T., MARDANI A., CAVALLARO F., LIAO H. 2019. A review of greenhouse gas emission profiles, dynamics, and climate change mitigation efforts across the key climate change players, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 234, pp. 1113–1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.140

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles